Tennis Club | All things Tennis, All the time

Posts Tagged ‘Federation’

Tennis Deserves Fault for Serena’s Flawed Justice

November 30th, 2009 |

Author: iwellbc

Filed under: U.S. Open

This is when a suspension is not a suspension, a major fine is not a major fine.

It took months to figure this out, how to word it perfectly, but on Monday, the International Tennis Federation did it.

It gave Serena Williams a punishment that wasn't a punishment.

The $175,000 fine and three-year suspended ban from the U.S. Open and probationary period for her f-bomb laced, threatening tirade at a tiny U.S. Open line judge do sound like big words, don't they?

They aren't. Break it down, and Williams will end up paying just $82,500. She recently referred to $50,000 as the furniture budget in her home remodeling.

If she doesn't have another major outburst, the fine is cut to that number, and the suspension thrown out. She will not miss a tournament. Her debt will be paid.

Look, the fine means nothing to Williams. She won't feel it. But the ITF can say that it's a record size.

OK, Serena? Is this OK with you?

I can only imagine ITF officials pleading with her to please, please let them appear to be an actual governing body.

You remember what happened. The line judge called footfault on Williams, who then waved her racquet in the judge's face and threatened to take the ``(f-ing) ball'' and shove it down her "(f-ing) throat.''

That led to a point penalty on match point. So the match was over.

Let's be honest: Race is an issue. It always is with tennis and the Williams sisters. Some people will think Williams was given a record fine because she's black. Others will think she was given a pass because she's black.

Some people think she was the bully, some think she was victim of a bad call.

The ITF doesn't really care what's right. That was never an issue. The only issue was this: How do you give a penalty that looks big but isn't?

The point isn't that she was punished too much or too little, but rather that it was a non-justice based on non-truths, when true leadership was crying out because people's real feelings were involved about the game, Williams, race, and sportsmanship.

The feelings are so real that some people insist the video evidence proves she never footfaulted. Others demand the video evidence proved she did.

Here's the truth: There is no camera shot, video or still, that can determine anything.

There are lots of truths missing here, a mess that has made tennis look uglier than ever. Williams' smokescreen reasons for her tantrum, her ``punishment,'' the ITF's naked self-interest, John McEnroe's irresponsibility.

The ITF let this thing drag on so long that hard feelings only grew. It became a social debate lining up mostly along racial lines.

So the ITF points out that this is the biggest fine ever at a major. Jeff Tarango got about half as much for storming off at Wimbledon and calling a chair ump corrupt. His wife later slapped the judge, too.

Of course, the ITF doesn't mention that Tarango was also banned from two majors. McEnroe was once suspended for two months.

Serena Williams, John McEnroe

But McEnroe had been a brat for years, and that could have been a career-achievement punishment. Serena has not behaved bad nearly as often, though she did threaten a player who cheated her at this year's French Open. In fact, one tennis official told the New York Times, "We're not talking about a John McEnroe type character here."

Here was the telling quote, a bit of truth, from ITF president Francesco Ricci Bitti a few weeks ago:

"I don't think (an Australian Open ban) would make much sense, because it would penalize the people handing out the punishment. For the grand slam committee to exclude her from a grand slam doesn't seem likely.

"A significant financial penalty makes more sense. But it has to be significant enough for the fans.''

They didn't want to kick her out of a major tournament because that would hurt the tournament. How is that's a concern to a governing body?

And they wanted a fine big enough to look like justice, not to serve it.

Let's go back over what really happened, over the truth.

Williams was in the semifinals of the U.S. Open playing Kim Clijsters in a tight match. Williams had been spouting off all year about how she was the real No. 1, not No. 1 ranked Dinara Safina. That had racial overtones. So did the sudden popularity of teenager Melanie Oudin, a white girl from the South, at the Open. How much of her appeal was that she was the great white hope?

So that was the setting. And Clijsters, just back from a 2 1/2-year break, was beating Williams. Williams was two points from losing when she was called for footfault on her second serve.

Did she footfault? Yes. Absolutely.

I was sitting just behind the line judge, several rows back. Other media members were sitting there too. She clearly stepped way out onto the thick baseline.

But that's not really the point. With several chances, Williams could not bring herself to play the final point. Why?

Because to her, that was less embarrassing than losing to a woman just back from maternity leave.
Williams quit this match, not planning to get thrown out, but knowing at some level that she would.

Meanwhile, McEnroe, still the face of the game in many ways, was on TV ripping the line judge, saying he didn't see a footfault and that a judge doesn't make calls like that such in a crucial situation. Juan Martin del Potro, by the way, was called for a footfault in a crucial third-set tiebreaker last week during the ATP Finals.

But whatever, McEnroe, famous for being a jerk to officials, was irresponsibly and unwittingly fueling a racial debate even though there was this truth:

From where he was sitting, he could not have seen whether Williams had actually foot-faulted.

The next day, Williams issued a statement calling it an "unfair line call.'' The day after that, with endorsers presumably upset, she issued a real apology.

She went on to win the tour championship, reclaim the No. 1 ranking, appear nude on the cover of ESPN the Magazine, pitch her new book, appear on Leno and every other show.

Did she get away with this? Obviously.

But was justice served? Well, that was never a consideration.

Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com

Tennis Deserves Fault for Serena's Flawed Justice originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Posted in Tennis |

Tags: anything, appeal, atp tennis, Australian, ball, ban, baseline, bit, Bitti, black, body, bomb, brat, Break, budget, bully, call, camera, chair, character, committee, concern, course, debate, debt, Dinara, drag, evidence, face, fact, Federation, Filed, fine, footfault, Francesco Ricci, French, furniture, game, game williams, girl, governing, governing body, half, head tennis, home, hope, ing, International, international tennis federation, irresponsibility, issue, ITF, Jeff Tarango, john mcenroe, judge, justice, kim clijsters, leadership, leave, level, line, line judge, lining, look, major, match, match point, maternity, Melanie Oudin, mess, Monday, New, nothing, number, official, open tennis, OpenThis, outburst, pass, penalty, period, planning, player, point, popularity, president, prince tennis, probationary period, punishment, quote, Race, racket tennis, racquet, real feelings, record, remodeling, Safina, self-interest, sense, Serena, serena williams, shot, size, smokescreen, South, sportsmanship, suspension, tantrum, teenager, Tennis, tennis club, tennis court, tennis courts, tennis game, tennis games, tennis live, tennis player, tennis players, tennis racket, tennis racquet, tennis racquets, tennis shoes, thing, throat, Times, tirade, tournament, true leadership, truth, type, U.S., U.S. Open, uglier, ump, victim, video, way, wife, williams sisters, wilson tennis, Wimbledon, woman, women's tennis, word, year, York |

Comments Closed

Serena, Lineswoman Won’t Hug It Out

October 20th, 2009 |

Author: iwellbc

Filed under: U.S. Open, WTA

Two days after threatening to shove a tennis ball down her throat, Serena Williams said she would like to give a U.S. Open line judge "a big ole hug."

Unfortunately, that happy -- heartfelt? -- reunion will have to wait. The Serena line judge, whose identity has remained a secret, will not be at the WTA Tour Championships next week in Doha, Qatar.

Neil Harman of The Times of London gave a few of the first-known details about the line judge, saying she is Japanese and travels the world calling lines. She was graded by her peers after the U.S. Open as among the top line judges throughout the U.S. Open Series of tournaments.

Here is what Harman wrote:

"The umpiring fraternity, which holds the lineswoman in high regard, believes that she was told not to travel to the Middle East because of the possible drama her presence might provoke, while the WTA insisted last night that she had been invited to attend and declined for family reasons."

Meanwhile, the International Tennis Federation continues its investigation, and it took real effort not to put quote-marks around the word investigation.

What could possibly be taking so long? The whole thing is on tape. The question is whether Williams will be fined more than the $10,500 she was already hit with, and also whether she will be suspended. A suspension could include major championships.

The call in question came with Williams just two points from losing to Kim Clijsters in the U.S. Open semifinals. Williams foot-faulted on her second-serve at 15-30, and then, after her f-bomb-laced, racquet-waving threats, was given a point-penalty. That penalty on match point meant that Williams had lost.

Anyone sitting along the line, including me, saw that it was a clear foot fault. Williams acknowledged after the match that she thought she had foot-faulted, but then later that she had not.

When the chair umpire called the line judge to the net to meet with two tournament officials, Williams approached, and said to the line judge, "Were you scared? Because I said I would hit you?" She later said she didn't know why the line judge would have been afraid.

A preliminary decision on any further punishments for Williams is expected around the end of the month. Williams then will have a chance to appeal.

The tournament in Doha could serve to determine who the final No. 1 player of the year is, as Williams is barely ahead of Dinara Safina in the computer rankings.

Best bet: The ITF won't have the nerve, after the angry divide in the debate over Williams' tirade, to suspend her from Doha and hand the year-end No. 1 ranking over to Safina. And it also won't have the stomach to suspend Williams from a major, as sponsors, networks and tournament directors would go nuts over the loss of the game's most marketable player.

Look for a big fine, and maybe a mandated "big ole hug."

Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com

http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,localizationConfig,entry&id=515408&pid=515407&uts=1256008494

http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/media_gallery/v1/ke_media_gallery_wrapper.swf

U.S. Open 2009