Tennis Deserves Fault for Serena’s Flawed Justice
November 30th, 2009 | 
Author: Filed under: U.S. Open
This is when a suspension is not a suspension, a major fine is not a major fine.
It took months to figure this out, how to word it perfectly, but on Monday, the International Tennis Federation did it.
It gave Serena Williams a punishment that wasn't a punishment.
The $175,000 fine and three-year suspended ban from the U.S. Open and probationary period for her f-bomb laced, threatening tirade at a tiny U.S. Open line judge do sound like big words, don't they?
They aren't. Break it down, and Williams will end up paying just $82,500. She recently referred to $50,000 as the furniture budget in her home remodeling.
If she doesn't have another major outburst, the fine is cut to that number, and the suspension thrown out. She will not miss a tournament. Her debt will be paid.
Look, the fine means nothing to Williams. She won't feel it. But the ITF can say that it's a record size.
OK, Serena? Is this OK with you?
I can only imagine ITF officials pleading with her to please, please let them appear to be an actual governing body.
You remember what happened. The line judge called footfault on Williams, who then waved her racquet in the judge's face and threatened to take the ``(f-ing) ball'' and shove it down her "(f-ing) throat.''
That led to a point penalty on match point. So the match was over.
Let's be honest: Race is an issue. It always is with tennis and the Williams sisters. Some people will think Williams was given a record fine because she's black. Others will think she was given a pass because she's black.
Some people think she was the bully, some think she was victim of a bad call.
The ITF doesn't really care what's right. That was never an issue. The only issue was this: How do you give a penalty that looks big but isn't?
The point isn't that she was punished too much or too little, but rather that it was a non-justice based on non-truths, when true leadership was crying out because people's real feelings were involved about the game, Williams, race, and sportsmanship.
The feelings are so real that some people insist the video evidence proves she never footfaulted. Others demand the video evidence proved she did.
Here's the truth: There is no camera shot, video or still, that can determine anything.
There are lots of truths missing here, a mess that has made tennis look uglier than ever. Williams' smokescreen reasons for her tantrum, her ``punishment,'' the ITF's naked self-interest, John McEnroe's irresponsibility.
The ITF let this thing drag on so long that hard feelings only grew. It became a social debate lining up mostly along racial lines.
So the ITF points out that this is the biggest fine ever at a major. Jeff Tarango got about half as much for storming off at Wimbledon and calling a chair ump corrupt. His wife later slapped the judge, too.
Of course, the ITF doesn't mention that Tarango was also banned from two majors. McEnroe was once suspended for two months.
But McEnroe had been a brat for years, and that could have been a career-achievement punishment. Serena has not behaved bad nearly as often, though she did threaten a player who cheated her at this year's French Open. In fact, one tennis official told the New York Times, "We're not talking about a John McEnroe type character here." Here was the telling quote, a bit of truth, from ITF president Francesco Ricci Bitti a few weeks ago:
"I don't think (an Australian Open ban) would make much sense, because it would penalize the people handing out the punishment. For the grand slam committee to exclude her from a grand slam doesn't seem likely.
"A significant financial penalty makes more sense. But it has to be significant enough for the fans.''
They didn't want to kick her out of a major tournament because that would hurt the tournament. How is that's a concern to a governing body?
And they wanted a fine big enough to look like justice, not to serve it.
Let's go back over what really happened, over the truth.
Williams was in the semifinals of the U.S. Open playing Kim Clijsters in a tight match. Williams had been spouting off all year about how she was the real No. 1, not No. 1 ranked Dinara Safina. That had racial overtones. So did the sudden popularity of teenager Melanie Oudin, a white girl from the South, at the Open. How much of her appeal was that she was the great white hope?
So that was the setting. And Clijsters, just back from a 2 1/2-year break, was beating Williams. Williams was two points from losing when she was called for footfault on her second serve.
Did she footfault? Yes. Absolutely.
I was sitting just behind the line judge, several rows back. Other media members were sitting there too. She clearly stepped way out onto the thick baseline.
But that's not really the point. With several chances, Williams could not bring herself to play the final point. Why?
Because to her, that was less embarrassing than losing to a woman just back from maternity leave.
Williams quit this match, not planning to get thrown out, but knowing at some level that she would.
Meanwhile, McEnroe, still the face of the game in many ways, was on TV ripping the line judge, saying he didn't see a footfault and that a judge doesn't make calls like that such in a crucial situation. Juan Martin del Potro, by the way, was called for a footfault in a crucial third-set tiebreaker last week during the ATP Finals.
But whatever, McEnroe, famous for being a jerk to officials, was irresponsibly and unwittingly fueling a racial debate even though there was this truth:
From where he was sitting, he could not have seen whether Williams had actually foot-faulted.
The next day, Williams issued a statement calling it an "unfair line call.'' The day after that, with endorsers presumably upset, she issued a real apology.
She went on to win the tour championship, reclaim the No. 1 ranking, appear nude on the cover of ESPN the Magazine, pitch her new book, appear on Leno and every other show.
Did she get away with this? Obviously.
But was justice served? Well, that was never a consideration.
Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com
Tennis Deserves Fault for Serena's Flawed Justice originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Posted in Tennis | 
Tags: anything, appeal, Australian, ball, ban, baseline, bit, Bitti, black, body, bomb, brat, Break, budget, bully, call, camera, chair, character, committee, concern, course, debate, debt, Dinara, drag, evidence, face, fact, Federation, Filed, fine, footfault, Francesco Ricci, French, furniture, game, game williams, girl, governing, governing body, half, home, hope, ing, International, international tennis federation, irresponsibility, issue, ITF, Jeff Tarango, john mcenroe, judge, justice, kim clijsters, leadership, leave, level, line, line judge, lining, look, major, match, match point, maternity, Melanie Oudin, mess, Monday, New, nothing, number, official, OpenThis, outburst, pass, penalty, period, planning, player, point, popularity, president, probationary period, punishment, quote, Race, racquet, real feelings, record, remodeling, Safina, self-interest, sense, Serena, serena williams, shot, size, smokescreen, South, sportsmanship, suspension, tantrum, teenager, Tennis, thing, throat, Times, tirade, tournament, true leadership, truth, type, U.S., U.S. Open, uglier, ump, victim, video, way, wife, williams sisters, Wimbledon, woman, word, year, York | 
Comments Closed
Wickmayer Suspended for Agassi’s Sins
It's amazing how much "no comment" can say. I've made a pet project of the curious case of Yanina Wickmayer, the young tennis player banned for a year from the tour for a doping offense even though she never missed a doping test and never failed one.Wickmayer is being punished for Andre Agassi's sins. That's how tennis is trying to save face, by crushing a 20-year old budding star who seems to have committed, at worst, a tiny infraction.
I've spent the past few weeks calling and emailing the doping agencies and governing bodies involved. You name the initials, VDT, WADA, WTA, ITF.
Most of them are B.S. In the end, this isn't even about Wickmayer anymore. It's about doping tests and steroids in sports in general. We need watchers to keep an eye on the cheating athletes.
But who is watching the watchers?
Here's what Koen Umans, spokesman for the Flemish anti-doping council (VDT) in Belgium that banned Wickmayer, wrote in an email response to a request for details of her case and a copy of the 20-page report on it:
"As for reason the procedure is not yet finalized at all (appeals are introduced at different levels), it shouldn't be correct to comment on the factuals as a spokesman of the court involved."
A spokesperson for the World Anti-Doping Agency said, "WADA must refrain from commenting on pending cases in order to protect the integrity of this review."
Integrity. Interesting. The thing is, agencies have already commented. VDT banned Wickmayer and said the punishment was just. Those are such strong comments that a young woman who just had her breakthrough, reaching the U.S. Open semis, had to pack up and leave a tournament. Imagine the humiliation.
Her agents had been close to lining up endorsements, too.
Those talks are on hold now.
Why didn't she inform the doping-testers where she would be, as rules require? That sounds bad.
She has an answer. She blames the Flemish anti-doping agency, and now, no comment from the agency.
We've heard so many ridiculous excuses for failed tests that no one believes athletes anymore. At the Turin Olympics, members of the Austrian ski team fled the country in fear of WADA testers and the law.
One official was thrown into an insane asylum. How great watching cheats running.
Wickmayer's name was smeared, her career seriously damaged and her reputation assaulted. And now the agencies won't explain? I've always been a fan of WADA. But Wickmayer's story passes the smell test. And WADA's and Flemish agency's silence casts the suspicion on them.
I'm starting to feel bad for the guy in the insane asylum.
Wickmayer's name was smeared, her career seriously damaged and her reputation assaulted. And now the agencies won't explain?
Look, if an agency is going to serve as judge and jury, then it has to be accountable for its paper trail. Open. Transparent.
"All the letters that I had to sign for upon receipt," Wickmayer said, "were sent back to the Flemish Anti-Doping Agency, meaning that they did know that I had never received them."
This is Wickmayer's case. She didn't report her whereabouts three times in 18 months.
Under WADA rules, the top 50 players have to tell testers where they'll be for an hour each day. Wickmayer wasn't in the top 50 yet, but countries can toughen-up those standards. The Flemish agency decided the top 50 wasn't enough.
So Wickmayer, from Belgium, had to account for her whereabouts. But someone needed to tell Wickmayer.
Here's her claim: She never reported her whereabouts because she didn't know she was supposed to. The Flemish agency sent her a letter in November or December of 2008 to inform her of her requirements, but she was training in Switzerland. The letter was sent via certified mail, meaning it wasn't delivered because no one was there to sign for it.
So it went back to VDT.
In February of 2009, she said, other players mentioned the whereabouts rule to her, so she wrote to the VDT to ask about it.
"I received an email back, which included a login and did not include any information about the one failed update I had already missed, without knowing that this system even exists ..." she said.
Strike one.The password the agency gave her never worked, she said. And after coming back from the U.S. seven weeks later, she called officials, who said they had to reset her password. What they didn't tell her: strike two.
For strike three, she misunderstood the form online and filled it in wrong.
So she has some blame here. For one, why did she wait seven weeks to mention that her password wasn't working?
One official said that when an athlete gives an address to a sports federation, that athlete is responsible for finding a way to receive mail sent to that address.
But when the agency got the letter back, couldn't it have called Wickmayer? Sent an email? Called an agent?
Umans said there would be a press conference in Brussels this week, and I asked if it would include details on how Wickmayer was informed.
Also, where can I get the 20-page report?
"We won't comment on particular cases," Umans wrote back. And, "We are not allowed and will not publish the verdict. I repeat it has been handed only to the parties involved."
Here's a timeline: A prosecutor in the case suggested that Wickmayer get a stern warning. Then Agassi humiliated tennis by admitting he lied his way out of a failed crystal meth test. Then Wickmayer was banned for a year.
Everything she says would be so easy to check. The Flemish agency must know whether its letters were signed for. Records could show whether officials called Wickmayer or sent emails.
One of Wickmayer's people told me the report says she's not suspected of doping or hiding from tests, but instead of technical errors.
Usually, it's the people with something to hide who say "No comment."
Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com
Wickmayer Suspended for Agassi's Sins originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Posted in Tennis |
Tags: address, Agency, andre agassi, answer, Anti, asylum, athlete, B.S. In, background color, Belgium, blame, breakthrough, career, case, cheating, claim, color, color ffffff, comment, copy, council, country, court, curious case, day, December, Doping, email, email response, end, eye, face, Facebook, fan, fanhouseButton, fear, February, federati, FFFFFF, Filed, form, Friend, general, governing bodies, guy, hold, hour, hover, humiliation, information, infraction, initials, integrity, ITF, judge, jury, Koen, law, letter, lining, link, login, mail, margin, name, none, November, offense, official, online, order, padding, page, paper, password, pet, pet project, player, procedure, project, punishment, reason, receipt, report, reputation, request, response, review, rule, semis, silence, ski, smell, someone, spokesman, spokesperson, star, steroids in sports, story, Strike, strong comments, suspicion, Switzerland, system, team, Tennis, test, text decoration, thing, tour, tournament, trail, Transparent, Turin, Twitter, U.S., U.S. Open, Umans, VDT, WADA, watching, whereabouts, Wickmayer, woman, World, world anti doping agency, wrong, WTA, WTAIt, Yanina, yanina wickmayer, year, young tennis player, young woman |
Comments Closed
WADA Crock: Making Wickmayer Pay for Agassi’s Sin
The head of the World Anti-Doping Agency acknowledged that it's too late to punish Andre Agassi for his failed drug test from 1997, darned statute of limitations. But WADA said it still wants some punishment, anyway. Maybe for Agassi's lies to doping officials, which he admits in his book? Maybe for perjury?Doubtful. But I knew tennis would get its pound of flesh, anyway, as Agassi has embarrassed the sport's governing bodies. What I didn't know was how fast they would get that flesh.
Or that they would take it from Yanina Wickmayer.
She was banned Thursday for a year for a doping offense. It wasn't for failing a test, or apparently even for missing one, though details still aren't out. It was because she failed to report three times to doping officials over the past 18 months where she would be.
So Agassi did crystal meth. Tennis swept it under the rug.
And Yanina Wickmayer took the fall.
How cold.
Players have to tell officials months in advance about their whereabouts for an hour each day, though they can adjust if their schedules change. Rafael Nadal calls it harassment. Serena Williams and others have complained.
Wickmayer has her excuses, but she blew it and she needed to be punished. How about a two-week suspension, a fine and a probationary period where she's tested twice a week?
A one-year ban? That's massive overkill.
Worse, it's pathetic and transparent.
Tennis is trying to send a message: See world? We are tough on drugs, no matter what Agassi says.
Look, if it's a PR campaign the sport wants, then it just happened to pick the wrong person to beat up, though the handiest, because her file was on the desk.
Wickmayer is the 20-year old Belgian who emerged at the U.S. Open in September, reaching the semifinals. Her mother died when Yanina was 9. Days later, Yanina told her father she wanted to move to the U.S. So he dropped everything -- house, business, cars and friends -- in his toughest grief and left within a week for his daughter's happiness. She had just taken up tennis to get away from the pain.
At the Open this year, I asked her about it, and she sat in front of her father and said this: "He listened to a girl that was 9 years old, and left his life, left his dreams. . .I have no words for what he's done. There is no way of thanking him in any way for what he did.
"But I hope with my semis here this week, I can show him that I really thank him for everything he's done. It's been great spending my whole life with him.''
Imagine hearing that from your teenage daughter.
On Thursday, Wickmayer withdrew mid-tournament from an event in Bali and left the country, as her suspension started immediately.
She denied wrongdoing and said she'll appeal.
Why do I think this is a stunt? Take a look at the calendar. She said a month ago, when her problems first came up, that she had had trouble with her password getting onto the WADA website to update her whereabouts.
On Oct. 22, a prosecutor at the Belgian anti-doping tribunal suggested she get a stern warning. That's where this was headed. And it's quite a difference from the one-year suspension from the tour that she got.
So what happened in those 14 days between warning and banning?
In his autobiography, Agassi admitted he had used crystal meth as a player in 1997, and had failed a test for it. He wrote that he talked his way out of trouble by saying he had mistakenly taken a sip of a friend's spiked drink.
So the ATP either stupidly bought it or swept the failed test under the rug because Agassi was a big name. I'll go with the second one. And suddenly the anti-doping people have fangs for Wickmayer.
To clarify, in 1997, the ATP ran its own drug-testing program. Now, tennis drug-testing has been handed over to WADA, known for its toughness. But earlier this year, player Richard Gasquet won an appeal over his suspension for failing a cocaine test. How? He said he had gotten the drug in his system by kissing a woman in a bar.
It's true we're talking about different organizations here. Wickmayer, along with fellow Belgian player Xavier Malisse, was suspended by a Belgian anti-doping tribunal. Wickmayer, ranked No. 18, is the fall person because tennis needed a top player for the hit. Malisse is barely in the top 100.
But tennis is an incestuous operation and all these different governing bodies can oddly work as one sometimes.
Things seem to be out of control in tennis. The ITF, all this time later, is still investigating Williams for her U.S. Open tirade, and theoretically will punish her within the next two weeks. Let's see how her punishment for threatening a line judge stacks up to Wickmayer's.
WADA has told the ATP to investigate Agassi's claims, which is like asking a fox to investigate the sudden disappearances in the chicken coop.
Meanwhile, CBS has released clips of Agassi's appearance on "60 Minutes" this Sunday, and he talks about the players former and current, particularly Martina Navratilova, who have been ripping him.
"I had a problem, and there might be many other athletes out there that test positive for recreational drugs that have a problem,'' Agassi said. ``So I would ask for some compassion ...
"I had way more to lose by telling this story in its full transparency than I had to gain. The part that I worry and think more about is who this may help.''
He risked reputation, but was paid $5 million for the book, for that risk. That was his price for supposed honesty. As for worrying about helping others with his message, well Andre, I'm sure that will make Wickmayer feel much better.
Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com
WADA Crock: Making Wickmayer Pay for Agassi's Sin originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:30:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Posted in AndreAgassi, RafaelNadal, SerenaWilliams, YaninaWickmayer, andre agassi, rafael nadal, serena williams, yanina wickmayer |
Tags: advance, Agency, andre agassi, Anti, appeal, appearance, ATP, ATPThe, autobiography, Bali, ban, bar, book, business, business cars, calendar, campaign, CBS, chicken, cocaine, control, coop, country, crystal, crystal meth, daughter, day, desk, difference, Doping, Doubtful, drink, drug, drug test, event, everything, fall, father, fellow, file, Filed, fine, flesh, fox, Friend, front, girl, governing, governing bodies, grief, handiest, happiness, harassment, head, hearing, hit, hour, house, ITF, judge, life, line, look, Martina, matter, message, meth, month, mother, name, Navratilova, Oct, offense, operation, overkill, pain, password, period, perjury, person, player, pound, pound of flesh, pr campaign, probationary period, problem, program, prosecutor, punishment, rafael nadal, Richard Gasquet, rug, September, serena williams, sip, sport, statute, statute of limitations, stunt, Sunday, suspension, system, Tennis, test, three times, Thursday, time, tirade, tough on drugs, toughness, tour, tribunal, trouble, U.S., U.S. Open, U.S. So, WADA, warning, way, website, week, whereabouts, Wickmayer, woman, World, world anti doping agency, wrong person, wrongdoing, Xavier Malisse, Yanina, year |
Comments Closed
Andre Agassi’s New Book to Reportedly Reveal He Tried Crystal Meth
Filed under: Media Watch, U.S. Open
Andre Agassi's new book, OPEN is due out in stores on Nov. 9. There's been relatively little fanfare about the book's release. That all changed Tuesday with a (now deleted) tweet from SI's Richard Deitsch, which was preserved by the good folks at The Sporting Blog.In his tweet, Deitsch intimated that there would be an excerpt from OPEN released in the newest issue of Sports Illustrated and that said excerpt would contain an admission from Agassi that he tried crystal meth:
FYI: There's an off-the-charts book excerpt from Andre Agassi in the forthcoming SI: He admits to taking crystal meth during his career.So, yeah: BAM. Or something. But before we tackle the possibility of Agassi hitting the meth pipe, what about the "twee-letion" (yeah, I'm not proud that I invented it either) from Deitsch?
Deitsch may have slipped up and revealed something earlier than SI wanted it publicized, but the general buzz around the tweet is guaranteed to boost mag sales even if the editors over there wanted to wait for the release of the news.
But, at the same time, Deitsch didn't exactly tease it like other members of the SI staff already had, and while the magazine has apparently secured first serial rights, apparently so has People (which, depending on how negotiations run in these things, might be the impetus for Deitsch's tweet being premature).
Speaking in a completely hypothetical manner, if I found out that Agassi used drugs when he was a young kid toiling through the grind of the professional tennis circuit, I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised. Agassi created an image of a "rebel" -- hell, the entire Canon camera line is more or less named after him -- and if you've ever seen some of the pressures that other young superstar tennis players deal with, and add in the time period that Agassi played, then it wouldn't be surprising to know that he engaged in some illegal substance use.
But, hey, maybe he didn't. Either way, you can almost guarantee that you'll see a tremendous boost in sales leading up to the book's release and immediately afterward.
Andre Agassi's New Book to Reportedly Reveal He Tried Crystal Meth originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:04:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Posted in andre agassi |
Tags: Academy, actor, admission, amp, andre agassi, Andy Murray, art, Art Unveiling, Artist, athlete, BAM, Ben Stiller, benefit, Bill, bit, Blog, book, book excerpt from, boost, Britto, buzz, California, camera, Canon, canon camera, Caption, career, casino, Children, circuit, com, concert, conference, contact, crystal, crystal meth, Denise Truscello, Dinner, discussion, documentary, domination, editors, Education, Entertainment, excerpt, fanfare, FanHouse, file, Filed, Foundation, Frank Micelotta, FYI, game, Gates, Getty, good folks, Graf, Grand, hell, Hollywood, hotel, Illustrated, image, Images, impetus, Industry, Isaac Brekken, issue, kid, Larry Ruvo, Las Vegas, Leader, lifestyle, line, little crystal, Local, Lot, mag, magazine, manner, Media, Melinda, meth, negotiations, Nevada, news, North America, Nov, OPEN, OpenAndre, Paramount, period, photo, Photos, Pictures, pipe, player, possibility, premiere, Prep, professional athlete, professional tennis circuit, rafael nadal, rebel, release, Richard Deitsch, roger federer, Romero, Roundtable, Schooled, Scotsman, Sept, September, serial, serial rights, Slam, something, source, Sporting, Sports, staff, Steffi, substance, successor, superstar, TABLOIDS, tease, Tennis, Terry Fator, time, toiling, Tuesday, tweet, tweetmeme, U.S., United States, use, Viacom, VIP, Watch, way, WireImage, Wynn Las Vegas, yeah |
Comments Closed
Serena, Lineswoman Won’t Hug It Out
Two days after threatening to shove a tennis ball down her throat, Serena Williams said she would like to give a U.S. Open line judge "a big ole hug."
Unfortunately, that happy -- heartfelt? -- reunion will have to wait. The Serena line judge, whose identity has remained a secret, will not be at the WTA Tour Championships next week in Doha, Qatar.
Neil Harman of The Times of London gave a few of the first-known details about the line judge, saying she is Japanese and travels the world calling lines. She was graded by her peers after the U.S. Open as among the top line judges throughout the U.S. Open Series of tournaments.
Here is what Harman wrote:
"The umpiring fraternity, which holds the lineswoman in high regard, believes that she was told not to travel to the Middle East because of the possible drama her presence might provoke, while the WTA insisted last night that she had been invited to attend and declined for family reasons."
Meanwhile, the International Tennis Federation continues its investigation, and it took real effort not to put quote-marks around the word investigation.
What could possibly be taking so long? The whole thing is on tape. The question is whether Williams will be fined more than the $10,500 she was already hit with, and also whether she will be suspended. A suspension could include major championships.
The call in question came with Williams just two points from losing to Kim Clijsters in the U.S. Open semifinals. Williams foot-faulted on her second-serve at 15-30, and then, after her f-bomb-laced, racquet-waving threats, was given a point-penalty. That penalty on match point meant that Williams had lost.
Anyone sitting along the line, including me, saw that it was a clear foot fault. Williams acknowledged after the match that she thought she had foot-faulted, but then later that she had not.When the chair umpire called the line judge to the net to meet with two tournament officials, Williams approached, and said to the line judge, "Were you scared? Because I said I would hit you?" She later said she didn't know why the line judge would have been afraid.
A preliminary decision on any further punishments for Williams is expected around the end of the month. Williams then will have a chance to appeal.
The tournament in Doha could serve to determine who the final No. 1 player of the year is, as Williams is barely ahead of Dinara Safina in the computer rankings.
Best bet: The ITF won't have the nerve, after the angry divide in the debate over Williams' tirade, to suspend her from Doha and hand the year-end No. 1 ranking over to Safina. And it also won't have the stomach to suspend Williams from a major, as sponsors, networks and tournament directors would go nuts over the loss of the game's most marketable player.
Look for a big fine, and maybe a mandated "big ole hug."
Email me at gregcouch09@aol.com
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,localizationConfig,entry&id=515408&pid=515407&uts=1256008494
http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/media_gallery/v1/ke_media_gallery_wrapper.swf
U.S. Open 2009
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
AFP
U.S. Open Photos
Jan Hernych of the Czech Republic plays a shot during his match against Argentina's Juan Monaco (out of camera range) in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 on the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. TOPSHOTS / AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19th, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Joachim Johansson of Sweden plays a shot during his tennis match against Australia's Peter Luczak in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 during the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Australia's Peter Luczak plays a shot during his tennis match against Joachim Johansson of Sweden in Stockholm on October 19th, 2009 on the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Australia's Peter Luczak plays a shot during his tennis match against Joachim Johansson of Sweden in Stockholm on October 19th, 2009 on the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Jan Hernych of the Czech Republic plays a shot during his match against Argentina's Juan Monaco (out of camera range) in Stockholm on October 19, 2009 on the first day of the ATP Stockholm Open tennis tournament. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
AFP/Getty Images
Serena, Lineswoman Won't Hug It Out originally appeared on Tennis FanHouse on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:15:00 EST . Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Posted in serena williams |
Tags: AFP, Anyone, aol, Argentina, ATP, Australia, ball, bet, bomb, call, camera, chair, chair umpire, Championships, chance, com, computer, credit, Czech Republic, day, debate, decision, Dinara, Doha, doha qatar, drama, effort, email, end, family, fault, Federation, Filed, fine, foot, foot fault, fraternity, game, Getty, gregcouch, Harman, hug, identity, Images, International, international tennis federation, investigation, ITF, Jan Hernych, Joachim Johansson, Juan, judge, kim clijsters, line, line judge, line judges, lineswoman, London, loss, major, match, match point, Middle East, Monaco, month, Neil Harman, nerve, net, night, October, ole, OLIVIER MORIN, open semifinals, peers, penalty, Peter Luczak, photo, Photos, player, point, presence, Qatar, question, range, regard, reunion, Safina, second serve, secret, Serena, serena williams, Series, shot, Stockholm, stomach, suspension, Sweden, tape, Tennis, tennis ball, thing, throat, Times, times of london, tirade, TOPSHOTS, tour, tour championships, tournament, tournament officials, U.S., U.S. Open, umpire, week, word, World, WTA, wta tour championships, WTATwo, year, year-end |
Comments Closed